Significant Results | Crime or Accident
  • About Robin Shellow
    • History of The Shellow Group from a Unique Perspective
    • Attorney Biographies
      • Robin Shellow
      • Urszula Tempska
    • Representation
  • Case Experience
    • Marijuana Cases
    • Complex White Collar Crimes
      • Major Mail and Wire Fraud Cases
    • False Accusations of Child Sexual Assault/Molestation
    • Possession of Internet Child Pornography
    • Federal Narcotics Conspiracies
      • Conspiracy Defenses
      • Defense of Drug Prosecutions
    • Homicide Defenses
    • Mental Disease or Defect
      • Mental Health Assessment
      • Competency
      • Not Guilty by Reason of Mental Illness
      • Mental Health and Syndrome Based Defenses
    • Civil Rights Violations
    • Defenses for Veterans
  • What You Need to Know
    • Criminal Defense Preparation
      • Nationally Recognized Creative Pre-charging Investigative Strategies
      • The Charging Conference
      • Pre-Trial Motions
      • Why The Shellow Group Files So Many Motions
      • The Relatoinship Between Pre-Trial Motions and Jury Instructions
      • Motion to Suppress False and Inaccurate Confessions
      • Nationally Recognized Creative Trial Defenses
      • Sentencing: The Paradox of Winning
    • Selecting the Right Lawyer
    • Expert Witnesses
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Nationally Respected Representation of Children and Youthful Offenders
      • The Youthful Offender
      • Children Who Kill
      • School Shootings
      • Secondary School and University Expulsion and Disciplinary Hearings
    • Avoiding the Criminal Justice Consequences of Addiction
      • Intervention
      • AODA and Mental Health Assessment
      • Mental Health Treatment Monitoring
      • Knowledge and Referral to the World's Best Treatment Centers
    • Acquittal of the Guilty
  • Contact Us
  • Home

WHAT YOU NEED TO
KNOW

Acquittal of the Guilty is
In My Blood

Not Guilty Verdicts and
Admissions of Guilt

The Shellow Group and Shellow & Shellow have represented those who admitted their guilt. Should they be acquitted?

  • A medical student whose career will be destroyed if he is convicted of possessing a gram of marijuana.
  • A doctor who cheated on his income taxes to retain sufficient funds to support his Alzheimer-plagued wife of 50 years who was in an assisted living home.
  • A father who provided a false alibi for his mentally ill son who was in a serious motor vehicle accident.

Shellow & Shellow represented Native Americans who were charged with the takeover of the trading post at Wounded Knee to protest treatment of Native Americans; Michael Cullen and the Milwaukee 14 who burned draft records to protest the war in Vietnam; the Chicago Priests who burned draft records in Chicago for the same reason; Father James Groppi who was charged with contempt of the legislature for protesting the State's treatment of the poor; the African Americans who were charged with blocking a sidewalk in West Point, Mississippi, when they were protesting that the local library only admitted Caucasians; bookstore owners and clerks who sold magazines depicting unclothed women; gay men who suggested intimacies to apparently interested undercover police officers; Daughters of Charity who were threatened with prosecution because they supported a doctor who had given marijuana to terminally ill cancer patients at St. Mary's Hospital; a seventy-year old woman in West Allis who used a few grams of marijuana a week to abate intractable pain; the editor of an underground newspaper who was charged in Whitefish Bay with distributing papers without a license; a nightclub owner in Milwaukee who was charged with allowing a dancer to sit too close to a customer; a young man who was promised exciting sexual adventures if he gave drugs to an undercover female police officer.

Michael Cullen, a former seminarian for whom the Archbishop of Colorado and the District Attorney of Milwaukee had testified as character witnesses, testified that he burned the draft records, intended to burn them, knew that it was a crime to burn the records, but that he could do nothing else, "So help me God."

A jury has the power to ignore the instructions of the judge and acquit these defendants. May a defense lawyer argue "jury nullification" and that the jury should exercise its power and acquit these guilty defendants? These are the questions which torment the criminal defense lawyer.

< return to top >

THE SHELLOW GROUP